Burying Truth: False Flags and Intentional Distractions
“AND THE FREQUENCY ALWAYS CHANGES. BREAKING FREE FROM THEIR CONTROL. INDEPENDENT WISDOM, MILES ABOVE. VISIONS EXPLODE FROM UNDERNEATH. CAN’T IGNORE WHAT YOU DON’T DEFINE. CONFETTI EXPLOSION FROM EVERY STREAM.” – “CONFETTI ALTERCATION” BY JD STAHL
“Confetti Altercation” is a term that I feel best describes the use of disinformation to intentionally create confusion. It is similar to the word “obfuscation.” Both describe situations where false information is produced that makes factual evidence seem unintelligible. Even if a person has found a box of secrets, attempting to reveal them or publish them in any way will undoubtedly cause those who are threatened to counter-react with false information.
Anyone who was willing to withhold truth from the public has already crossed over the line of deception and secrecy. From this position, lying is not that big of a stretch. In fact, lying is just the active form of the (passive) silence. In order to protect these secrets, one of the methods would be to create a bunch of “decoy” documents. The quality of these falsified documents do not even need to be believable. Part of proving them wrong or inconsistent is part of the plan. It would be like hashing in 50 pages of truth with 50 pages of lies—and then shuffling them together. After they are mixed up, even the most logical mind would have difficulty attempting to separate them into separate stacks again.
Creating “confetti” is a way that makes the act of seeking truth seem virtually impossible. As quickly as a few documents can be disproven, that places doubt on all of the others. Therefore, if someone does actually discover secrets that are protected, it is helpful to keep them to yourself until you can find supporting evidence in other areas. Creating consistency allows someone to draw patters which cannot be eroded by misinformation or spun into a false narrative. Attempting to cross so many lines at the same time to fight off all of these patterns would just make someone look guilty, desperate, and anxious.
Similarly, passionately asserting yourself or making claims when only a linear proof is presented can be “spun” in a way that will eventually deteriorate your credibility. However, if you can hold off your assumptions and quietly study your environment long enough, then you can vindicate yourself (and possibly others as well).
“WHAT HAVE YOU DONE TO CREATE ALL THE COPIES? THE PRESIDENT IS CALLING FOR YOUR TINY HAND. THE FLAGS ARE RISEN EVERY TIME THAT YOU STAND. WHO’S THE MAN YOU MADE TO MAKE IT? OR ARE YOU FAKIN’ IT? OH, CAN I TAKE IT? YES. CAN YOU TAKE IT?” – “MATRIX MYSTERY” BY JD STAHL
Considering there is so much money and power involved in selling a false narrative to the public, there really isn't anything that is “off the table” to implement in society. Not only is false information used to bury the actual truth, but to further “sell” these lies, people can be hired to make the false information seem more real than it is. These “actors” are normally stakeholders in the greater agenda, willing to lie to ensure that their investments or interests are secure. Sometimes, all it takes is to threaten someone with their loyalty to their country, family, or belief system to make it seem like they abuses are somehow validated.
Both parties (democrat and republican) have various groups of extremists that represent them. However, both of these parties are intelligent enough to control how these members act or how the news media represents them. Yet, being that people can easily be “hired” to play these acting roles, we really can't trust anything that we witness with our own eyes. More frequently than not, people are hired to stage an extremist event, posing as the other party. In this act, they purposefully create misinformation that can be used to disenfranchise the other party. This bad press strategy purposefully attempts to cause people to switch parties or just simply doubt the majority agenda of their chosen “side.”
Simply put, we should never run immediately to an absolute conclusion before ensuring that we are indifferent to any possible outcome. Had I had a specific preference for the way I wished things would go in my life, I could have easily clung to a certain narrative that was most beneficial to me. Sadly, this even makes “facts” impossible to trace back to the source without appearing like a conspiracy theorist. At the same time, if I were attempting to design a system of obfuscated truths to disguise an agenda, this would be the perfect strategy that would virtually eliminate anyone from challenging it. Not only do these people get away with their false flag events, but they don't even need to defend themselves against claims; because, well, it would just sound “crazy” or conspiratorial.
If I wanted to protect myself more than I wanted truth, then my very own preferences could be used to silence me. The only way I could regain faith in reality was to endure whatever hardships and have faith that the truth would “set me free.” Fortunately, at this point in my life, I really didn't have much left to lose. I had already considered suicide; after that, the only thing that I really wanted was to be able to believe in the truth. What I didn't realize that when anyone is willing to die to preserve something so precious as the truth, it activates something within the universe that will stop at nothing to conspire towards your goal.
Comentários